Skip to main content

Full text of "Report on operation "Backfire""

See other formats


»-tr £:JL^T 



^y^^^u:^^^ui^. 



THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF H.B.M. COVER 

and is intended only for the personal information of 




Copy No. 853 



and of those officers under him whose duties it affects. He is personally responsible for 
its safe custody and that its contents are disclosed to those officers and to them only. 
The document will be kept in a locked safe when not in actual use. The possession 
of the document will be accounted for annually in accordance with King's Regulations. 



I 





Report on 

OPERATION ^'BACKFIRE'' 




VOLUME V 

Recording and Analysis 

Prepared for Printing by the Ministry of Supply 
THE WAR OFFICE, LONDON, S.W.I 



January 1946 



I 



p 



Report on Operation ''BACKFIRE'' 



MAY TO OCTOBER, 1945 



CONTENTS 



Volume 5, 



SECTION I . Recording and analysis of the trajectory 

APPENDIX I. Details of system used to provide impulses for the kine theodolites 
APPENDIX 2. Log of operations- 
October 1, 1945 

October 2, 1945 

October 4, 1945 

October 15, 1945 

APPENDIX 3. Radar drills and search data 

APPENDIX 4. Radar modifications 

APPENDIX 5. Explanation of " Backfire " survey grid 

APPENDIX 6. Trajectory diagrams 

SECTION 2. Photographic records 

SECTION 3. Fuel characteristics and storage 




INDEX 



Action photography 

Alcohol — 

Quantity and data 

Railway tank waggons 

Angle of sight — ^negative bias in 
Application of scale factor — ^grid system 
Asbestos clothing — when used 
Aspect angle and implications 

B.B.C. time signal used 

B — Radar — site location : equipment 
Behaviour of rockets 

Cameras — 

Details of for the three launchings 

Films used in 

Type and numbers used 

Capacity of liquid storage tanks 
Climb too rapid — ^rate of— No. 3 rocket 
Clothing, asbestos — when used 

Command post logs 

Communications — 

Signals 

Wireless 

Comparison signal strength at R i and R 2 
Comparison of theodolite and radar results 

Computation of results 

Constant following, poor results on GL II 

Construction of grid system 

Control of kine theodoUtes 

Control point, recording 

Data— 

And quantity — Alcohol 

And quantity — Hydrogen peroxide 

And quantity — Sodium permanganate 

Graphs of SCR 584 

Obtained, recording 

Quahty of the SCR 584 

Rocket I 

Signal, R I, R 2 and R 5 
Deployment of kine theodolites 
Details of cameras for the three launchings 

Diagrams, trajectory 

Drill and modifications to equipment 
During flight, tracking rockets 

Echoes, sustained fall of shot 

Equipment — 

Location ; site — B — radar 
Used — cameras ; searchlight 

Fall of shot — 

Observing— Site R 4 

Plotting ... 

Sustained echoes 

Field operation, priority of 



Para 

58 

69 

70 

53 
17 
66 

39 

13 

5 

21 

59 
61 
62 
45,60 
68 
26 
66 
19 

14 
15 
41 
52 
31 
48 
16 
4 
14 



69 

71 
73 
55 

2 

51 
22 
42 

3 
61 

56 

12 

I 

46 

5 
59 



Films used in cameras 

Flight data— Rocket 3 

Fuel- 
Characteristics and storage 
Cut oflF, reason for not clear- 
Cut off— Rocket 2 



-Rocket 2 



Para 

62 
27 

63 
25 
23 

31 

48 
49 
50 
55 

17 
16 

71 
72 

33 
24 

2 
I 



44 
46 
20 



General — computation of results 

GLII— 

Poor results on constant following 

Range 110,000 yards doubtful 

Useless " putter on " for more accurate radars 

Graphs of SCR 584— data 

Grid system — ' 

AppUcation of scale factors 

Construction of 

Hydrogen peroxide — 

Storage and transport 

Individual performance of radars 

Initial acceleration — Rocket 2 

Introduction — 

Recording data obtained 

Tracking rockets during flight 

Kine — 

Control ... 4 

Theodohtes — 

Deployment of 3 

Performance of— Rocket i — Oct. 2 28 

Liiquid — 

Storage and transport tanks for 67 

Storage tanks, capacity of 68 

Liquid oxygen 63 

Oilin 65 

Purity of 64 

Location, site, equipment — B radar 5 

Logs, command post 19 

Meaning results of theodolites 32 

Modifications to equipment and drill 12 

IVegative bias in angle of sight 53 

Observing fall of shot — site R 4 10 

Oil in liquid oxygen 65 

Oxygen — quantity used 63 

Performance of kine theodohtes — Rocket i — Oct. 2 28 

Photographic records, stiU photography 57 

Photography — 

Action 58 

Still 57 

Plotting fall of shot ... 44 

Priority of field operation 20 

Purity of Hquid oxygen 64 



IIVDEX {cent:} 



Quality of the SCR 584 data 

Quantity and data — 

Alcohol 

Hydrogen peroidde 
Sodium permanganate . . 



Radar — 

B, site; location; equipment 

Individual performance of 

General 

Range of rocket signal 

Re-deployment of 

Sites — 
R I — observations of rocket flight 
R 2 „ ,j J, J, 

•^ 3 }j a )i jj 

-^ , 5 jj j> 33 33 

Radar and theodolite results — comparison . . . 

Railway tank waggons — alcohol 

Range of rocket signal '. 

Rate of climb too rapid — No. 3 rocket 
Reason for fuel-cut-ofF not clear — No. 2 rocket 

Recording data obtained 

Recording control point 

Recording time of take-oflf— site R 5 

Re-deployment of radar 

Results — computation of 

Results of— 

Rockets launched , 

Theodohtes — ^meaning 

Rocket — transfer of sodium permanganate into 
Rockets — 

Behaviour of 

Launched — results of 

Rocket No. i — 

Behaved normally 

Data 

Rocket No. 2 — 

Initial acceleration 

Reason for fuel cut-off not clear 

Suffered fuel cut-off" 

Oct. 4th functioning of posts 

Rocket No. 3 — 

Flight data 

Rate of chmb too rapid 

Oct. 15th — ^functioning of posts 

Signal of 

R I, R 2 and R 5 — signal data 

R 4 — no fall of shot observed 



Scale factors, application of— grid system ... 

SCR 584 data, quahty of 

Searchlight 



Para 

69 

71 

74 



5 

33 
39 

54 

7 

34 
35 
36 
37 
38 
52 
70 

54 
26 

25 

2 

14 
II 

7 
31 

18 
32 

74 

21 
18 

21 
22 

24 

25 
23 

29 

27 
26 
30 

45 
42 
47 



77 

5 

59 



Signal — 

DataRi, R2andR5 

Of rocket 3 

Range of 110,000 yds. from rocket 2 doubtful , 

Strength at extreme ranges 

Strength at R i and R 2, comparison of 

Signals communications 

Site — 

Location; equipment — B— Radar 

Ri— 

Signal strength 

View in direction of laimching site 

R2— 

Signal strength 

View in direction of launching site 

R 3 ; tracking rockets near vertex 

R 4 ; observing fall of shot 

R 5 ; recording time of take-off 

Radar R i — observation of rocket flight 

Radar R2— „ „ „ 

Radar R 3— „ „ „ 

Radar R 4— „ „ „ „ ... 

Radar R 5— „ „ „ „ ... 
Sodium permanganate 

Quantity and data 

Transfer into rocket 

Storage and characteristics of fuel 

Storage and transport of hydrogen peroxide 

Storage and transport tanks for liquid 

Survey 

Sustained fall of shot echoes 

System, grid — construction of 



Take-off, recording time of— -Site R 5 
Tanks — 

Liquid storage, capacity of 

Storage and transport, for Hquid 
TheodoHte and radar results, comparison . . . 
Theodolites — 

Kine, deployment of 

" Meaning," results of 

Time signal from B ,B.C 

Tracking rockets — 

During flight 

Near vertex — site R 3 

Trajectory diagrams 

Transfer into rocket — sodium permanganate 
Transport and storage of hydrogen peroxide 



Variation of signal strength . . . 
View in direction of launching site- 

Ri 

R2 



Wireless communication 



Para 

42 
45 
49 
43 
41 
14 



40 
6 

40 
8 

9 
10 

II 
6 
8 

9 
10 
II 
73 
73 
74 
63 
72 
67 
16 
46 
16 



II 

68 
67 
52 

3 

32 
13 

I 

9 

56 

74 
72 



39 

6 

8 



15 



Recording and Analysis of the Trajectory sectioiv J 



INTRODUCTION 

1 . SCRs 584, GLs II and a Type 14 Radar were deployed 
along the western coast of the Danish peninsula to track 
the rockets during flight and to determine their point of 
fall. In order to obtain more precise data of behaviour 
during the period of burning kme theodolites were used 
to produce a precise optical record of the initial part of the 
trajectory. 

2. " X " Special Radar Battery and No. 2 AA (ATS) KT 
Detachment were made available to operate radars and 
kine theodolites, respectively, and a detachment of nine 
HAA recording vans to record the data obtained. By 
suitable tie-up between radar and optical results it was 
hoped to gain experience of the accuracy and the general 
behaviour of radars used in tracking long range rockets. 

DEPLOYMENT 

A. — Kine Theodolites (KTs) 

3. Two German Askania kine theodolites were obtained 
to supplement the two brought from the United Kingdom 
by the KT Detachment. Four posts were established as 
follows : — 

^^:566?|jJ}"S"tish"AskaniaKTs(F6oo lenses) 
KDRR;59957977}^™^ ^^^ ^Ts (F300 lenses) 



4. Kine Control was established beside KT site A in a 
HAA recording van. This site was also Radar Site R 5. 
A diagram of the deployment is at Plate i. All four posts 
were connected to Kine Control by an omnibus speech 
circuit. Individual lines radiating from Kine Control to 
the four posts supplied the impulses for the cameras. 
These lines were for the most part in German underground 
telephone cables. By means of mechanical clock and the 
appropriate electrical circuits at Kine Control, all four 
KTs were pulsed simultaneously twice per second. In 
addition, an electrical counter was made to move with the 
pulses, and the counter was photographed 12 times/sec. 
beside a i/ioo sec. stopwatch (see later description of site 
R 5). After preliminary Hne troubles the system proved 
satisfactory. For details of the pulsing system see 
Appendix i to this Section. 

B.— Radar 

5. Five sites were deployed with equipment as follows 
(see map at Plate 2) : — 

All SCRs 584 except that at R 5 and all GLs II were 
fitted with long range modifications. 

6. It was desirable to avoid sites to the east of the river 
ELBE as they were in the German Army concentration 
area " G." Site R i was therefore deployed south of the 



SITE 


LOCATION 


EQUIPMENT 


Ri 


BENDORF RN 090125 

(later at TONNING RM.786361) 

(Nord de Guerre Zone Grid) 


2 SCRs 584 


2 HAA Recording Vans. 


R2 


I of NORDSTRAND VB.8167 
(North European Zone Grid) 


I SCR 584 (with 8 ft. para- 
boloid). 

I GL II. 

For Rocket 3 a second SCR 
564 (with N2 gate and 
auto-follow in range) was 
deployed 


I HAA Recording Van. A 
second van was deployed 
for rocket 3. 


R3 


EMMELSBULL VW.763048 
(North European Zone Grid). 


I SCR 584. 
I GL II. 


I HAA Recording Van. 


R4 


RINGKOBING VR. 724502. 
(North European Zone Grid). 


I AMES Type 14. 
I GL II (modified). 
I LW (AA No. 4, Mk. Ill) 
(Rocket 3 only). 


I HAA Recording Van. 


R5 


DOSE RR.615891 

(Nord de Guerre Zone Grid) 


I SCR 584 (with cine camera 
on paraboloid). 


I HAA Recording Van (with 
Cine camera). 



KINE-THEODOUTE DEPLOYMENT. 



Plate 



E N 

A Post 661491-2 789113-8 

B .. 656603-3 783056-2 

C - 663466-6 784002-7 

D •• 659948-4 779772-3 



\ 



<^. 




Bftiat. 



Scale. 1:50.000. 



3000 

wAmm 



4000 YARDS. 




DPost. 



^/ 



^^/ 




•%' 



CUXHAVEN. 



©CFbst. 



Kiel Canal. Originally the site was very similar to that 
at STEENBERGEN in HOLLAND, which had been used 
to observe rockets launched from the HAGUE area at 
LONDON. At a late date, however, tlie proposed line of 
fire was swung 4° further west, thus making aspect angles 
from this site less favourable. The equipments were sited 
on the highest ground in the area with a clear field of view 
in the direction of the launching point. The two SCRs 584 
were deployed side by side. It was found that so sited, 
mutual interference due to imlocked pulses (running 
rabbits) was such as to make simultaneous operation of the 
sets impossible. When looking towards the launching 
site the dipoles of the radars were intervisible. Thus, for 
the first two launchings only one radar was in action at this 
site. 

7. The results from R5 on Rockets i and 2 had been 
unexpectedly good and actually of longer duration than 
from R r. R i was therefore of Httle use in its first 
position. As Area " G " had been reduced in size it was 
decided to move R i further north to a position where it 
could be expected to obtain trajectory data beyond the end 
of the plot produced by R 5. Re-deployment was carried 
out in time for the third and final launch on Oct. 15. A site 
at TONNING (RM7836) recommended by A.O.R.G., 
was chosen in order that the maximum length of follow 
would be achieved, although it was reaUsed that the head 
on aspects Hkely to be encountered might make following 
difficult at first. Recording of the equipment was done on 
a Westex Recorder modified to receive selsyn data trans- 
mission from two SCRs 584. An accurate i/ioo sec. 
stopwatch was used. 

8. Site R 2 was also chosen to have a good field of view in 
the direction of the launching site. The SCR 584 here 
was fitted with an 8-ft. paraboloid with the aid of which it 
was hoped that the rocket would be followed from launch. 
This did not prove to be so, and it was found that a longer 
aerial spinner was necessary where an 8-ft. paraboloid was 
used. This had not been supplied with the parab oloid but 
was obtained in time for Rocket 3. For Rocket 3 a second 
SCR 584 with an N^ gate, borrowed from the R.A.F., was 
deployed. This radar was modified for auto follow in 
range by means of a unit provided and fitted by IX Air 
Defence Command, United States Forces, European 
Theatre. A GL II with normal array was deployed with 
the intention of obtaining constant following to provide 
trajectory data and to assist the SCR 584 to pick up the 
target should it fail initially. The aerial heights were 
modified slightly to give optimum results, and provision 
was niade for putting the SCR 584 on target by suitably 
marrying the magslip and selsyn transmissions (see 
Appendix 4). Recording was carried out in the normal 
manner using a i/io sec. stopwatch. 

9. At R3 both SCR 584 and GL II were sited with the 
intention of picking up and tracking rockets as they neared 
the vertex of the trajectory. As at R 2 the GL II was in- 
tended to do constant following and if necessary to put the 
SCR 584 on target. For this purpose data transmission 
was modified in the same way as at R 2. On account of 
the high angle of search siting was not critical. Recording 
was carried out in the normal manner using a i/io sec. 
stopwatch. 



10. Equipment at R4 was deployed with the intention of 
determining the fall of shot. The unmodified AMES Type 
14 radar was sited on a suitable hummock some 20 ft. 
above the surrounding ground with a clear view in the 
direction of the target area. The GL II fitted with the 
normal BB modification was originally sited on the assump- 
tion that rockets would be fired at a range of 320 kms. 
(200 miles). The shorter range of 250 kms. (156 miles) 
made the expected aspect angle of rockets unfavourable, 
but it was nevertheless decided to retain the radar but 
with aerials set so as to lower the beam. By this means it 
was thought that air break-ups might be detected which 
would be missed by the Type 14. The GL II was sited 
normally on flat ground. An unmodified LW set (AA 
No. 4, Mk. Ill) was deployed to observe the fall of shot of 
Rocket 3 in order to test its suitabiHty in this role. It was 
sited as for the Type 14. All recording at R 4 was done 
manually. 

11. At R 5 an SCR 584 was sited on the sea wall roughly 
8,000 yards from the firing point. A long follow was not 
expected due to aspect angle and range rate considerations, 
and the set was therefore not modified for following beyond 
32,000 yards. Recording of the selsyn data on a Westex 
Recorder was done by means of a Filmo 70 DA Cine 
camera, running at 12 frames per second. Time was 
provided by a i/ioo second stopwatch. On the dial board 
of the recorder was situated an electric pulse counter which 
provided the means of tying up kine theodolite and radar 
records. The exact time of take-off of rockets was recorded 
by means of a light which was switched on automatically 
by the rocket as it lifted from the firing table (an external 
" Abhebekontakt "). On the paraboloid of the SCR 584 
was fitted a Cine Kodak camera with a 6" telephoto lens. 
This recorded at 16 frames per second a picture of the 
accuracy of follow of the radar. 

12. At Appendix 3 will be found details of the " drill " 
carried out at each radar site together with the search data. 
Appendix 4 contains details of modifications carried out to 
SCRs 584 and GLs II. It was necessary to devise a special 
long range modification to the former sets on account of 
the unsuitability of the Westinghouse modification for 
fitting to sets made by the General Electric Company. 

13. No special apparatus was installed to tie up in time 
data recorded at the various sites. A special BBC broad- 
cast of the Greenwich time signal at half-hourly intervals 
between 1400 hrs. and 1600 hrs. each day was arranged. 
These signals were received by all recording vans. AH 
stopwatches were started simultaneously at 1400 hrs. or on 
a later time signal if launching was delayed. They were all 
stopped simultaneously on the time signal immediately 
following the recordings. 

SIGNALS COMMUNICATIONS 

14. A Recording Control Point was established at 
RR615891, at the same place as Kine Control, KT Site A 
and Radar site R 5. Thus at RR615891 were one SCR 584, 
one kine theodoHte, and two HA A recording vans. One 
of these vans housed kine control with its speech and 
impulse lines to all KT sites, and the second van the 
recording gear for the radar and the speech lines to all 
radar sites. Communication to the radar sites was by direct 



DETAILS OF AIMING POINT. LINE OF FIRE & 
RADAR DEPLOYMENT 



Plate! 




line to HQ X Radar Battery (HUSUM) and thence by 
radiating pairs to sites R i, R 2 and R 3. Ali recording 
vans used telerepeaters Mk. I, and by using one at the end 
of each line it proved possible to have all radar sites on the 
Une at the same time. The recording vans at the recording 
control point had a line to the command post at the firing 
point. A second line was available as a standby. 



15, It was originally intended that R 4 (in DENMARK) 
should be served with lines communications in the same 
way as R I, R 2 and R 3, but delay ia installation forced 
this station to rely on the alternative wireless net. This 
was provided by a Wireless Section equipped with No. 33 
sets. One of these sets was deployed at each of sites R i, 
R 2, R 3 and R 4, with two sets at the Recording Control 
Point (R 5). The sets were netted R 5 to R 4, and R 5 to 
R I, R 2 and R 3, two nets being necessary to cover all 
the sites. The net R 5, R i, R 2, R 3 was able to work 
RT. : that to R 4 only W,T. A diagram of the signals 
layout is given in Plate 3. 



20, It was decided before launching commenced that 
where the requirements of the field operation clashed with 
those of the flight recording, the field operation would 
have priority. Therefore, launchings were not delayed if 
radars or kine theodolites were out of action. 

BEHAVIOUR OF THE ROCKETS 

Rocket i 

21. Judging from the fall of shot this rocket behaved 
normally. Using a time switch to give fuel cut-oflf a 50 
per cent, zone for range of ± 10 kms. should be expected 
of " normal " shots, since in the absence of an integrating 
accelerometer or radio fuel cut-off no allowance is made 
for variation in bmner performance. The closeness of the 
fall of shot to the point of aim (1-9 km. short) is satisfactory 
evidence that the thrust unit behaved normally. It was 
unfortunately not possible to plot the exact position and 
time of fuel cut-off from the recorded results due to the 
unsteadiness of the velocity graph obtained from the 
kine theodoUte records. 



SURVEY 

16, 20 Special Survey Det, RA, carried out the survey of 
the kine theodolite and radar sites. It was decided to 
construct a special grid system to co-ordinate the results of 
all recording sites. This was necessary because two grids 
(Nord de Guerre and North European Zone III) were 
involved in the area, and the Nord de Guerre grid was so 
far extended from its origin as to be insufficiently accurate 
for the purposes of recording. The " BACKFIRE " 
Grid was therefore constructed. It consisted of the North 
European Zone III extended southwards and swung about 
a point near to the launching site in order to have the same 
orientation as the Nord de Guerre zone grid. The co- 
ordinates of this point on the " BACKFIRE " grid were 
taken to the same as those on the Nord de Guerre Zone 
Grid, 



17, Certain scale factors were appUed in order that 
distances measured on the grid between latitude 53° 40' N, 
and 55° 00' would not differ from the true distance by 
more than 0-62 part in 1000, This margin of error held 
good for distances measured to points further north if 
measured from the launching point. All survey and com- 
putation of results was carried out using this grid system. 
Further details of the grid wiU be found in Appendix 5. 



RESULTS 

18, During the first phase of operations, Oct, 1-6, two 
rockets were successfully launched (Oct. 2 and 4). On 
Oct. I two unsuccessful attempts were made to launch the 
rocket which was eventually launched on Oct, 4 One 
further rocket was launched during a special demonstration 
on Oct, 15. 



22. The velocity graph shows that the rocket had an 
initial acceleration of 0-89 g, rising to more than 3 g. in the 
region of fuel cut-off. The velocity at fuel cut-off must 
have been of the order of 1,410 m/sec. to give the observed 
range. The angle of inclination to the horizontal at fuel 
cut-off was 39°, and the observed time of flight 287 
± 5 sees. The vertex height above groimd was 69-4 kms. 
The rocket fell 1-2 km. to the left of the line of fire, corre- 
sponding to an error in fine of 0*28°. 

Rocket 2 

23. This rocket suffered fuel cut-off after 34I sees,, by 
which time it had achieved a velocity of 520 m/sec. and 
was at an inclination of 58° to the horizontal. The range 
to the fall of shot was 25-0 kms., the vertex height 17-4 kms. 
and the total time of flight 136 ± i sees. The rocket fell 
0'99 km. to the left of the fine of fire, corresponding to an 
error inline of 2-3°. 

24. The initial acceleration of the rocket was i-02 g. 
Thus the thrust of Rocket 2 was 10-15 per cent, greater 
than for Rocket i, resulting in a greater acceleration than 
normal. This impression was also gained by experienced 
Germans who observed the take-off. 

25. The reason for early fuel cut-off is not clear. It could 
not have been fuel cut-off due to overrunning of the 
turbine (schnellschluss) since the centrifugal switch which 
gives the cut-off signal for this is not energised until 40 
sees, after take-off. It is certain that no physical break-up 
of the rocket occurred, neither did it burst into flames, 
since this would have been observed by the kine theodoHte 
operators. From the theodoHte films it would appear that 
flames were still being emitted from the venturi for some 
6 sees, after the rocket ceased to accelerate. 



19. The Command Post Logs giving the sequence of 
events on these days is at Appendix 2. It will be observed 
that with the exception of the failures on Oct. i and delay 
in fuelling on Oct, 2, all other launches went according to 
plan with little or no delay. 



Rocket 3 

26, No visual results are available for the trajectory above 
2,000 ft. The acceleration at take-off was i-02 g,, which is 
greater than the normal value. This is confirmed by the 
radar results which show that although the trajectory was 



K SITE 
A 



^ 



SIGNALS LAYOUT FOR RECORDING 
FIRING POINT 



Plate 3 



ROCKET 

Q 



COMMAND POST 



RECORDING CONTROL POI^ T 



KINE 

CONTROL 



Pulse 
ClocK 



Omnibus 

KIne 

SplTech 



RVIOI 



"^ 



Take-oFF^ 
Indicator Lamp 

t 

KS RECORDER 



RADAR 

CONTROL 



KB KC KD 
SAHLENBURG 



JI 



B 



RVi09 



307 BDE 



HSCR 
584 



R4 RI-2-3 



SIGS 
WIRE- 
HLESS 

UNIT 



HUSUM 
B HQ 



X RADAR 



(Emergency Line to /\ A A A 
X Radar BHq) Ri R2 R3 R4 



standard m space the rocket climbed more rapidly up its 
trajectory than it should have done. In spite of this, it fell 
i8-6 kms. short of the aiming point. This indicates either 
that the time switch operated several sees, sooner than it 
ought to have done, or that thrust deteriorated after 
45 sees., or that fuel cut-off was given by overrunning of the 
turbine (schnellschluss). 

27. Time of flight was 274 ± 3 sees, and the vertex height 
is estimated to have been approx. 64 kms. above ground. 
The rocket fell 5-3 kms. to the right of the line of fire, 
corresponding to an error of 1-3° in the line of fire. 

PERFORMANCE OF KINE THEODOLITES 
Rocket i — Oct. 2 

28. The weather was good, with an almost clear blue sky. 
All posts fimctioned correctly without hitch. " A '* post 
lost target before the others due to a patch of cloud. Due 
to a fault in the cine camera in the R 5 recording van 
which caused the film to blur, thus making the pulse 
counter illegible, it was not possible to tie in these results 
with the radar results with any great accuracy. The exact 
time of take-off in relation to the theodolite records could, 
however, be obtained from the records of " B " post. 

Rocket 2— Oct. 4 

29. The weather was cloudless with slight high haze. 
Only two posts (A and B) functioned correctly, " C " post, 
due to Hne trouble, was only working locally, and " D " 
post was out of action with a faulty camera motor. " A " 
post lost target after approximately 50 sees, due to haze. 
" B " and " C " posts followed the projectile down to 
zero elevation at a distance of 25 kms. from the firing point. 

Rocket 3 — Oct. 15 

30. Low cloud covered the area. The target was lost in 
cloud at 2,000 ft. All theodolites functioned correctly. 

GENERAL 

31. Computation of results revealed that synchrony of the 
four theodolites was not perfect. Results were worked out 
using pairs of bases, and it was found that CD base gave 
results which tended to lead those of AB. Photography 
of a spinning gramophone disc revealed only very slight 
errors of synchrony between instruments when they were 
working close together without long lines. The newer 
instruments acquired from the Germans were a little 
quicker to act than the older " British " instruments, but 
the greatest difference between instruments did not exceed 
1/60 sec. The conclusion is that the source of the trouble 
was delays in pulse transmission through the long lines 
from the Kine Control Point to the KT sites. 

32. Meaning the results of all available theodolites pro- 
duced useful results for an appreciable distance beyond the 
fuel cut-off point. Velocity curves were rather unsteady 
in the region of fuel cut-off. This was because the rocket 
and flame became invisible on the film some time before 
cut-off, and in evaluating the film it had to be assumed that 
the rocket was in the centre of the field of view. 

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE OF RADARS 

33. In addition to the breakdowns which caused certain 
equipments to be out of action during the firing, about 



75 per cent, of the equipments had serious breakdowns at 
one time or another during the preparatory stages and in 
intervals between launches. The majority of troubles was 
due to failure of components such as transformers, motors, 
condensers and resistors. This is probably symptomatic 
of equipments which have been in storage for a fairly long 
period. The performance of the various sites is dealt 
with in detail below. 

RADAR SITE R i 

34. Rocket i. — Only one SCR 584 was in action. It fol- 
lowed the rocket for 33 sees. The initial signal/noise ratio 
was 6 : i, and range of pick-up 65,000 yds. Aspect angle of 
target lost was approximately 100°. The second SCR 584 
was out of action due to trouble with the long range 
modification. 

Rocket 2. — One SCR 584 was in action. The signal 
appeared as before but was lost after 6 sees, when the radar 
locked down on to groimd echoes. A fault was later dis- 
covered in the anti-lockdown modification. The second 
SCR 584 could not be used due to mutual interference. 

Rocket 3 . — New site at TONNING. Increased spacing 
between radars allowed both to operate simultaneously with- 
out interference. Both SCRs 584 saw the rocket with 5 — i 
signal strength and locked on. The signal faded rapidly 
after a few seconds. One radar attempted to lock on a 
second time when the rocket was some 20 kms. above 
ground (range 60,000 yds. and aspect 80°), but the 
radar did not track and the signal faded. The rocket 
probably went through the edge of the radar beam. 

RADAR SITE R 2 

35. Rocket i.— The SCR 584 and the GL II failed to 
observe the rocket. It was later found that a longer spinner 
was necessary to work with the 8-ft. paraboloid and this had 
not been supplied. In the case of the GL II a fault was 
later discovered in the transmitter band pass filter which 
was causing loss of power. 

Rocket 2. — Both radars were in action but failed for the 
same reason as given for Rocket i. 

Rocket 3. — The 2 SCRs 584 (one with an 8-ft. parabo- 
loid and N^ gate) saw the target for a few seconds only. 
Signal/noise ratio was i| : i at each. The signals faded 
immediately and no tracking was done. The rocket was 
not seen subsequently. The GL II followed in range only 
for 18 sees. The signal/noise ratio was 2 : i, which was 
insufficient to allow constant following in bearing and 
angle. 

RADAR SITE R 3 

36. Rocket i.— The SCR 584 did not observe the rocket 
probably due to the natural hazards of scanning the sky for 
a fast moving target. The GL II observed the target i min. 
54 sees, after launch at a range of 79,200 yds., bearing 
217-8% A/S 457°. The target was lost after 21 sees. The 
radar track shows an apparent horizontal velocity of the 
rocket of 1/6 of the true value. The angle of sights was 9° 
too low and the bearing rate of change 6 times too small. 
The slant range was also approximately 10 per cent, too 
small. The initial signal/noise ratio was 3 : i falhng to 
4:1. 



Rocket 2.— The SCR 584 was out of action and could in 
any case not have been observed since the rocket fell short. 
The GL II saw the target for i sec, 70 sees, after launch at 
a range of approximately 1 10,000 yds., bearing 214°. The 
break faded before it could be brought to the cross wire. 

Rocket 3.— The GL II was out of action with VT 98 
valve filament and transformer defects. The SCR 584 
picked up the rocket unaided and tracked for approximately 
15 sees, at a range of 83,000 yds. 

RADAR SITE R 4 

37. Rocket i.— The Type 14 PPI was out of action. The 
radar observed a saturation break at 85,000 yds. range 
(E 557550J N 1,01 1,500 Backfire Grid). Range and ampli- 
tude were steady for 30 sees, which the radar transmitter 
tripped. Estimated accuracy was ± 500 yds. in range and 
± I J° in bearing (± 2,000 yds.) 

GL II — ^no target seen. 

Rocket 2.--The rocket fell short, beyond the range of the 
radars. 

Rocket 3.— The Type 14 radar saw the fall of shot at 
78,000 yds., bearing 240° (E 570100 N 998500). The signal 
was less strong than for Rocket i : signal/noise ratio was 
initially 5 : i becoming 4 : i almost immediately. The 
signal diminished to zero amplitude slowly. It was visible 
for 68 sees. The LW Radar (AA No. 4, Mk. Ill) saw the 
break for approximately i sec, 3 sees, earlier than the 
Type 14 at a range 79,200 yds. bearing 246° (± io°)- 
GL II — ^no target seen. 

RADAR SITE R 5. 

38. Rocket i. — Immediate pick-up was obtained, The 
signal faded and the radar ceased accurate following at 
15,000 yds. The radar operator tended to overrun in range 
by expecting a greater rate of increase of velocity than 
occurred. Film from paraboloid camera was useless due to 
over-exposure. 

Rocket 2. — The target was lost at 20,000 yds. due to 
fading signal. The camera on the paraboloid gave good 
results. Higher ratio gears were fitted to the range unit to 
allow higher range rates to be produced. These produced 



somewhat erratic operation due to imperfect fitting, but did 
not increase the range of tracking. 

Rocket 3.— The target was lost at 29,000 yds. The 
camera on the paraboloid was useless due to cloud. 

RADAR GENERAL 

SCR 584— Variation of Signal Strength with Aspect 
Angle and its Implications 

39. In the absence of special recording apparatus no actual 
measurements of signal strength could be made to relate 
signal strength to aspect angle. Some very strong im- 
pressions as to its effect were however gained. Site i in 
its initial position south of the KIEL CANAL was known 
to be poorly sited, and a long follow was not expected. 
Experience with such a site had already been gained with 
an SCR 584 deployed in HOLLAND observing launchings 
from the HAGUE and HOOK OF HOLLAND areas. 
When re-deployment was considered sites at HEIDE 
(RM 8723) and TONNING (RM 7736) were the alterna- 
tives. In order to achieve the maximum distance of follow 
the latter site was chosen. This site, however, produced 
no success for either of the SCR's 584, the signal being good 
initially but fading rapidly. 

40. The situation at R2 was similar with the addition that 
the initial signal observed was a great deal weaker (1} : i) 
even where the 8-ft. paraboloid was being used. The con- 
clusion must be that for R 2 and the re-deployed R i the 
inclination of the rocket to the vertical was already sufl5- 
ciently great at pick-up to reduce signal strength below that 
necessary to allow the radar to track at such ranges. 

41. It is, however, worthy of note that although good 
following was not achieved from the site at TONNING the 
range and bearing data at pick-up would have been suflBcient 
to obtain a rough pinpoint of the launching site had it been 
hostile. At R 2 it is doubtful if such iiSbrmation could 
have been deduced from the results since the signal was 
not visible for sufficiently long to enable a bearing to be 
determined. With the aid of a " side by side " presenta- 
tion of the signals produced by the bearing spHt, the bearing 
of the laimching position could probably have been 
deduced. 

42. The actual values of aspect angles for the various sites 
were as follows : — 

(zero aspect is directly head on, 180° direcdy tail on) 





ON TARGET 


initial 

sig/noise 

ratio 


target lost 

1 












RANGE 


ASPECT 


RANGE 


aspect 




YDS. 


n 




YDS. 


C) 


Ri (first site) 


65,300 


90 


6/1 


66,500 


100 


( « «) 


65,200 


90 


6/1 


65,200 


91 


(second site) 


62,000 


84 


5/1 


61,600 


79 


( « « ) 


60,000 


81 


5/1 


60,000 


81 


^ ( - ») 


61,500 


82 


5/1 


60,000 


74 


R2 (assumed values — 


(For rocket 






(For rocket 




radar did not track) 


height 2,000 ft.) 






height 5000 ft.) 






77,000 


82 


4/1 


77,000 


75 


R5 


— 


— 


— 


15,200 


151 






(abnormal trajectory) 


20,100 
29,800 


120 
147 



43. It would appear from these results that at a range of 
60j000 yds. head on aspect angles of less than 80° cannot 
be tolerated if the radar is to track. Even at ranges of 
15,000-20,000 yds. the sensitivity of signal strength to aspect 
is very marked, although the presence of the flame may 
also have aflected the strength of signals received in this 
case. On the second rocket the radar followed for some 
time after the end of burning. This target was still lost 
at 20,000 yds. with an aspect of 120°. 



FALL OF SHOT PLOTTING 

44. The success achieved by the Type 14 was satisfactory 
proof that it can be used to plot fall of shot out to a range of 
at least 85,000 yds. and probably considerably more. On 
the first rocket a saturation signal was received from a 
range of 85,000 yds. It was visible for 30 sees, without 
diminution when the radar transmitter tripped and no 
further observations could be made. The third rocket 
was observed at 78,000 yds. but with a smaller signal 
(sig./noise 5 : i). In each case the range to the target 
remained unchanged during the whole period for which 
the break was visible and the signal was steady. It would 
therefore appear that it was a fall of shot phenomenon and 
not the descending projectile which was seen by the radar. 

45. The signal from Rocket 3 was visible for 68 sees. 
During this time the amplitude decreased to zero. Had 
the signal been due to tiie column of water one would 
expect it to grow slowly and diminish slowly. In fact the 
radar echo grew immediately to full strength, dropped 
almost immediately by about 1/5, and subsequentiy de- 
cayed slowly. A water spout 3,000 ft. high would collapse 
in about 14 sees. Had the signal been due to a column of 
water, the colunm must have been much greater than this. 

46. It is notable that the Germans report observing the 
same phenomenon of sustained fall of shot echoes during 
their trial work done from Peenemunde. Here they 
observed fall of shot by radar (Freya) and reported un- 
expectedly good results. They reported large signals 
visible long after the physical waterspout had collapsed, 
but could offer no explanation. 

47. The GL II at R 4 did not observe either of the falls 
of shot. The aspect angle of the falling projectile was un- 
favourable and observation of the rocket was not expected. 
The LW radar (AA No. 4, Mk. Ill) which observed Rocket 
3 reported a break some 3 sees, before the Type 14, but the 
break did not remain visible for more than i sec. It seems 
probable that the echo was the rocket descending through 
the radar beam. The time discrepancy was probably 
caused by the dead time entailed in traversing the Type 14. 



GL II 

48. On only one occasion was any constant following 
attempted and the results were so poor as to be useless as 
track data. The groimd speed of the projectile as given 
by the radar was 1/6 of its true value and the height 12 kms. 
low. There is also strong evidence that the slant range 
of 79,000 yds. was 10 per cent, too small. In spite of the 
slant range to the rocket being less than 79,000 in one case 
(R 2, Rocket 3) the signal strength was poorer and tracking 
was not possible. The cause of poorer signal strength 
would almost certainly be the head on aspects of as low as 
75° which occurred, although a polarisation effect due to 
horizontal aerials may have reduced the signal strength. 
The rocket in this case was climbing whereas for R 3 it 
was more nearly horizontal. 

49. The signal from Rocket 2 observed by the GL II at 
R3 at a range of 110,000 yds. must be regarded with 
suspicion. It is said to have occurred 70 sees, after 
launch. At this time the rocket must have been at the 
top of its trajectory (ht. 17 km.) with zero incHnation. 
Aspect angle would therefore be approximately 30° (head- 
on). This signal was only visible for a few seconds and 
disappeared before its range could be measured accurately. 
There can, therefore, be no certainty that it was in fact 
due to the rocket. 

50 . In the only case where the GL II is said to have tracked 
the rocket the bearing and angle data were not good enough 
to have put an SCR 584 on target. The inability of the 
GL II to produce sufl&dentiy accurate bearing and angle 
data makes it for all practical purposes useless as a " putter 
on " for more accurate radars. 



QUALITY OF THE SCR 584 DATA 

51 . Apart from the radar data from R 5, two other radars 
produced track data. The SCR 584 at Site i followed the 
first rocket from soon after launch up to a height of about 
30,000 ft. The track produced can be seen on tiie trajectory 
diagram at Appendix 6. The second radar was that at 
R 3 which followed Rocket 3 at a range of 83,000 yds. just 
before it reached the vertex. Here again following was not 
good, but the range was extreme. The ground plan and 
vertical plots can be seen at Appendix 6, No smoothing 
has been done and, in fact, the track is of such poor quahty 
as to make satisfactory smoothing impossible. 

52. At R 5 it was possible to collect precise data as to the 
performance of the SCR 584 by comparison of theodoHte 
and radar results. The average errors of following in 
bearing, angle and range are given in the table below : 



ROCKET 


AV. ERROR 


BIAS 


MEAN DEVIATION 

(bias removed) 

A/S 


CONSISTENCY 


NO. OF 
READINGS 


Bg 


A/S 


Bg 


A/S 


Bg 


A/S 


I 

2 


0-22° 
0-22° 


0-27° 
0-23° 


—•09° 
—20° 


—23° 
—16° 


o-i6° 
o-i6° 


•15° 
•16° 


•17° 
■10° 


74 
74 



13 



53. A negative bias in A/S of about 0-04° is to be expected 
due to a small displacement for which no correction has 
been made. Readings were made twice per second. Con- 
sistency is the average of the first differences of adjacent 
errors, and is a measure of the smoothness of the radar data. 
Further data will be available from the 16 mm. film taken 
from the camera on the paraboloid. The film cannot, 
however, be evaluated on the Continent and will in any 
event not produce results any more accurate than those in 
the table on page 13. Evaluation of the film will be 
carried out at A.O.R.G. 



54. It was expected that the SCR 584 at R 5 would lose 
target due to the large range rate. In fact the signal was 
so poor at ranges greater than 20,000 yds. that it could not 
be held. This is shown by the results achieved on 
Rocket 2 where the rocket was followed for some time after 
it had ceased to accelerate. It was, nevertheless, lost at a 
range of 20,000 yds. Auto-range tracking would therefore 
not have increased the range of following, although it would 
undoubtedly have improved the quality of the data. It 
is interesting that the radar succeeded in holding Rocket 3 
out to a greater range than the previous two. This was 



the only rocket to go to the right of the hne of fire and as 
such would present a sUghdy more favourable aspect angle. 

55. Graphs of the SCR 584 data can be seen at Appendix 6. 
These show visual and radar data against time. The 
aspect angle of the target is also shown. 



TRAJECTORY DIAGRAMS 

56. At Appendix 6 will be found the following diagrams of 
the initial part of the trajectory of each rocket : 
(i) Ground plan track 

(2) Vertical plane plot 

(3) Velocity 

(4) Inclination 

In the case of Rockets i and 2, kine theodolite data is 
available. SCR 584 data from R 5 is given in each case 
and SCR 584 data from R i in the case of Rocket i. In 
each case the corresponding data for a " normal " rocket 
has been plotted. For Rocket 3 the SCR 584 track from 
R 3 is given in ground plane and the vertical plane. The 
extrapolated trajectory has been plotted on the graphs as 
accurately as is possible. 



Details of System used to provide 
impulses for the Kine Theodolites 



APPEIVDIX 



The clock, a Contactor Master Type i, closed relay (A) 
twice per second. This relay closed a circuit containing 
24 volts from accumulators supplying the four kine 
theodoHtes in parallel with 25 m. amps. 

In parallel with the lines to the kine theodolites was a 
second relay (B.) This relay opened a circuit containing 
an electrical counter which moved in consequence. At 
the end of each impulse the contact at (A) was opened and 
at (B) closed, thus arming the coimter in preparation for the 
next pulse. 



CLOCK LINES K.SITE 

r^fifi^?5£:t= ohms. A 

eOOohms.z: B 

475 ohms. =z C 
520ohms D 




PULSE 
COUNTER 



14 



I 



Log of Ops.— October 1, 1945 



APPENDIX 



2 



f 



TIME 


SEQUENCE OF EVENTS 


TIME 


SEQUENCE OF EVENTS 


0930 


Control point manned 


1527 


Fuel column left launching site 


1043 


Fuel column left KRUPPS 


1527 


Commander, 307 Inf. Bde. reported 


1045 


Setting up of rocket completed 




" All clear " 


1050 


All kine sites manned 


I54I 


Meilerwagen departed 


1 108 


All kine lines tested 


1542 


Orienting completed 


1209 


All K.T's colHmated 


1542 


X-15 warning to recording sites 


1330 


R I, R 2 and R 3 manned 


1546 


Insertion of igniter 


1400 


Watches synchronised with B.B.C, 


1549 


Steering tests completed 




time 


I55I 


X-3 warning to recording sites 


14II 


Rocket tests completed 


1552.5 


Red Verey hght fired 


I412 


Fuel column arrived at launching 


1554 


Attempt to launch rocket 




site 


I75I 


X-15 warning to recording sites 


1425 


Tanking begun 


1752 


All radars and kines ready for action 


1425 


X-60 warning to recording sites 


1800 


Watches checked with B.B.C. 


1433 


All radars ready for action 


181O 


X-3 warning to recording sites 


1500 


Time check 


1812 


Red Verey light fired 


1522 


Fuelling completed 


1815 


Attempt to launch rocket 


1523 


X-30 warning to recording sites 


I815 


Stand down 



Log of Ops.— October 2, 1945 



TIME 


SEQUENCE OF EVENTS 


TIME 


SEQUENCE OF EVENTS 


0930 


Control point manned 


1400 


All recording vans synchronised 


0950 


Setting up of rocket completed 




time with B.B.C. 


IOI6 


Fuel column leaves KRUPPS 


1406 


Superfluous personnel leave launching 


1050 


Fuel column arrived special vehicle 




site 




park 


1408 


X-30 warning to recording sites 


1055 


All kine sites manned 


1408 


Tanking completed. Departure of 


1055 


Main rocket tests completed 




fuel column 


II20 


All Kine lines tested 


1410 


All transport clear of temporary car 


1200 


Fuel column arrives launching site 




park 


1245 


Tanking procedure commences 


1415 


Igniter inserted 


1247 


X-60 warning to recording sites 


1425 


X-15 warning to recording sites 


1249 


All K.T. colhmation completed 


1428 


Orienting completed 


1305 


Radar R 2 reported out of action 


1430 


Departure of Meilerwagen 




Radar N at R i, and Radar at R 5 


1432 


Type 14 at R 4 ready for action with 




reported ready for action 




modified range tube 


1337 


Kine at site C out of action — ^impulse 


1436 


All kine theodolites ready for action 




line not working 


1437 


Test radar report 


1344 


Comd. 307 Inf. Bde. reported " All 


1437 


Steering tests completed. Launching 




clear " 




troop take cover 


1355 


Type 14 at R 4 reported out of action 


1437 


K-3 warning to recording sites 


1400 


Watches synchronised 


1441.12.3 sees. 


Rocket launched 



15 



Log of Ops.— October 4, 1945 



TIME 


SEQUENCE OF EVENTS 


TIME 


SEQUENCE OF EVENTS 


0915 
1006 

lOIO 
1045 

1049 
II30 
1225 

1254 
1254 
1255 

1302 

1302 
I34I 


Setting up rocket completed 
Control point named (delay due to 

transport breakdown) 
Fuel column leaves KRUPPS 
Fuel column arrives at special vehicle 

park 
All kine sites manned 
Main rocket tests completed 
Fuel column arrives at launching 

position 
Tanking commences 
X-60 warning to recording sites 
PreUminary radar report 
Only R 5 completely ready for action 
All kine lines tested. (Delay due to 

fault on impulse line at site B) 
K.T. collimation completed 
X-30 warning to recording sites 


1345 

1347 

1355 
1356 
1400 
1400 
1401 
1404 

1404 
1406 
1409 

14010 
1412 
1414 
1415.55.09 sees. 


Comd. 307 Inf. Bde. reported " All 

Clear " 
Tanking completed. Fuel column 

departed 
Superfluous personnel warned oif site 
All radars ready for action 
Orienting completed 
Time synchronised with B.B.C. 
X-15 warning to recording sites 
All transport clear of temporary car 

park 
Igniter inserted 
Departure of Meilerwagen 
Steering tests completed. Launching 

troop take cover 
Kine site C out of action 
X-3 warning to recording sites 
Red Verey Hght fired 
Rocket launched 



Log of Ops.— October 15, 1945 



TIME 


SEQUENCE OF EVENTS 


TIME 


SEQUENCE OF EVENTS 


0900 

0920 
1030 
1043 
1047 
II20 
II30 

II50 

1302 
1330 
I33I 


Setting up of rocket completed. 
(Preliminary work had been done 
ahead of schedule) 

Control point manned 

All kine sites manned 

Fuel column left KRUPPS 

Main rocket tests completed 

All kine Hues tested 

Fuel column arrives at special vehicle 
park 

Radar report : R i, R 2, R 4 and R 5 — 
Ready for action. R3 — SCR 584 
ready for action. GL II — High 
angle cams being fitted. Estimated 
to be ready for action at 1230 hrs 

Fuel column arrived at launching site 

Tanking procedure begins 

X-60 warning to recording sites 


1400 
1430 
1430 

1432 

1432 
1450 
1452 
1454 

1455 
1455 
1458 
1500 

1502 

1504 

1506.26.5 


Recording vans synchronised time 

Time check with B.B.C. 

Comd. 307 Inf. Bde. reported " All 

Clear " 
Tanking completed. Fuel column 

departed 
X-30 warning to recording sites 
All transport clear of car park 
Warning to clear launching site 
All radars on the air and ready for 

action 
Orienting completed 
Igniter inserted 
Meilerwagen departed 
Steering tests completed. Launching 

troop takes cover 
X-3 warning to sites 
Red Verey light fired 
Rocket laxmched 



To accommodate the distinguished visitors the normal time 
allowed for the procedure was extended by 45 minutes. This 
explains the gaps in time between various events. Though 



not necessarily following the normal sequence in time, the 
procedure for preparation was carried out without a hitch, 
although the tanking procedure did take longer than usual. 



X6 



Radar Drills and Search Data 



APPEl^DIX 



3 



GL II STATIONS at R 2 AND R 3 

1 . Equipments were mamied and operated as for normal 
aircraft engagements, and laid on the calculated crossing- 
point bearing. (The aspect at crossing-point is 90°). 
Ranges were set on the potentiometer scale corresponding 
to approximately 2,000 yds. in excess of the expected 
crossing-point range, to allow for pick-up shordy before 
crossing-point. 

R 2 Search Range 70,000 yds. Angle 30°. 

R3 „ „ 84,000 „ Angle 45°. 



2. The transmitter aerial switch was permanently left at 
" Follow " and " Follow " drill was ordered by GL I on 
receipt of the signal given from the command post at the 
firing point 3 minutes before launch. " Sig. Sel " was 
not used and bearing and angle operators used a con- 
tinuous bright trace. This was useful in cutting out the 
effect of sUght errors in time-base tracking. 



GL II STATION at R 4 (Range only) 
3. This equipment was operated as for a normal BB 
watch, with Operators i and 2, and recorder-timekeeper. 
(BB = Big Ben, and refers to the procedure used during 
Operation " CROSSBOW.") 



SCR 584 at R 3 

6. This equipment was directed at the crossing-point 
bearing angle and range with an angle search of ± 100 mils 
carried out by an extra operator. On the report " Target," 
No. 3 set in a clockwise rate of change of bearing of 
approximately i°/sec. This was necessary to hold the 
target in the beam for a sufficient length of time for 
strobing and switching to " Automatic." 



Search data : — 



R3 



3,965 nuls 



Angle 
800-1,000 m^s 



Range 
82,000 yds. 



SCR 584 at R 5 

7. The equipment was directed at the fixed bearing and 
range of the firing point, and at a fixed angle of 5°, 
"Target" was reported by No. 2 when the signal was 
visible in strobe patch, and No. 3 switched to " Auto- 
matic." In the later stages of following it is necessary for 
No. 2 to follow using the " slew " hand wheel. 

Search data : — 

Bearing Angle Range 

R5 - 224° 5° 7,800 yds. 



GL RANGE CALIBRATION 

4. Cahbration pips were checked against Westex readings 
daily, and immediately after engagements. 



SCR 584 EQUIPMENTS at R i, R lA AND R 2 
5. A small search area approximately 3° each side of the 
surveyed bearing of the firing point was covered and a 
range approximately 1,000 yds. in excess of the surveyed 
range was set. It was thought necessary to carry out a 
small search to cover possible ahgnment errors and at the 
same time to " paint " the PPI. Angle setting 20 mils 
was employed. Normal operating driU was carried out. 
In the case of R 2 " 2nd lay " was ordered by No. i if no 
pick-up was made within 30 seconds of " Shot," and range, 
bearing and angle figures corresponding to crossing-point 
were then set, with a search in angle of ± 100 mils. 



Search data : — 






Bearing 
Ri ... 4,292 mils 
RiA ... 3,610 „ 
R2 ... 3,428 „ 


Angle 
20 mils 
20 „ 
20 „ 


Range 
65,210 yds. 
61,900 „ 

79,775 » 



AM.E.S. TYPE 14 at R 4 

8. This equipment was operated normally and traversed 
over an arc of ± 15° each side of the bearing to the target 
point, increased to + 15° and — 30° for Rocket 3. The 
average time of the complete double traverse for the 30° 
search arc was 8 sees., and for the 45° search arc 10 sees. 
The PPI was not employed and all readings were taken by 
obtaining a maximum break on the range tube by bracket- 
ing for bearing and subsequently reading the range and 
bearing scales. 



Search date : — 

Bearing 
R 4 ... 240° — ^270° 

Rocket 3 ... 225° — ^270° 



L W at R 4 



Angle Range 

0° 70,000 — 100,000 yds. 
0° 70,000 — 100,000 „ 



9. This equipment was operated for Rocket 3 only. The 
serial array was in "low" position and drill normal. 
Search data as for Type 14, Rocket 3. 



17 



Plate 4 




Radar Modifications 



APPEIVDIX 



A.— MODIFICATIONS TO SCR 584 TO ENABLE 
THE EQUIPMENT TO TRACK OVER A RANGE 
ZONE OF 32,000 YDS. BETWEEN o AND 96,000 YDS. 

1. General. — The standard extended range modification 
to the equipment was taken as a basis. Further components 
had to be added or existing components changed in value 
to ensure stability of operation of the range unit. Stable 
tracking was then possible in range over any desired range 
zone of 32,000 yds. between o and 96,000 yds. The 
standard modification includes an extensive modification to 
the gearing in the range indicator imit. This was not 
necessary using the method described below. 

2. — ^Method. — The 1.7 kc. multivibrator, 1.7 kc. ampli- 
fier, narrow gate and wide gate circuits were modified as 
shown in attached circuit diagram (PLATE 4). The existing 
20K narrow gate potentiometer in the range indicator imit 
was removed and replaced by a 20K Hohal potentiometer. 
This was set so that a resistance value of 14K existed across 
piQS A and C of the potentiometer when the range indicator 
was set at zero. The 20K potentiometer labelled " Speed " 
was mounted on the chassis for screwdriver control. 

3. The 5 K.N.G. delay potentiometer was mounted on the 
chassis for screwdriver control and was replaced in its old 
location by a 25 K potentiometer to give the operator a less 
fierce control over the narrow gate delay. 

4. Setting Up. — The range unit was set up as far as the 
5 kc. multi-vibrator by the CRO method. The " 17 kc." 
was then adjusted to count down four times. The " Speed," 
N.H. delay and N.G. potentiometers were then adjusted to 
ensure range tracking in the range zone between 32,000 
and 64,000 yds. It is then possible by movement of the 
narrow gate delay to bring the " narrow gate " (visible as 
a bright patch on the course range tube) to any range 
between o and 96,000 yds. and smooth strobe tracking 
over the selected range is possible. 

5. Where a range zone selected does not lie between 
o — 32,000, 32,000 — 64,000 or 64,000 — 96,000 yds, it is 
advisable to mark the course range indicator with a line 
to which the N.G. Strobe is aligned when the operator is 
adjusting N.G. delay. 



B. MODIFICATION TO GL II EQUIPMENT FOR 
LONG RANGE CONTINUOUS FOLLOWING 

GL RECEIVER 

6. Aerial System.— (a) At Site R2 the elevation aerials 
were fixed at normal height for the frequency in use and 
the bearing and range aerials were all adjusted to o-sA. 



(b) At Site R3 the bearing and range aerials were 
dropped to 0-4 A to increase the angle of the lobe, and in 
addition a high angle cam was fitted and the heights of the 
elevation aerials altered accordingly. 



7. Time Base Modifications. — (a) To increase the length 
of time base scan two -ooi UF 5000V porcelain condensers 
were connected in parallel with the main time base con- 
denser on both the range time base unit and the bearing and 
elevation time base unit. This was done by drilling two 
J-in. holes in the panels and screwing down the condensers 
on each panel. The tops of the condensers on the range 
time base panel were connected to terminal 23, whilst those 
on the bearing and elevation time base panel were connected 
to terminal 27. "^ 

(b) The resistors R32D to L on the range time base 
panel were removed and substituted by eight 220 K ohms 
3 watt resisters. 

8. Kipp Modifications.— (a) The Kipp was modified to 
give a longer negative pulse by connecting a -002 UF 350V 
working condenser across C42A and a o-i UF 350V working 
condenser across C40A. 

(b) A o-i UF 350V working condenser across C26A was 
fitted to increase brightness of " putter on " stroke (B.S.E.). 

9. Calibrator Modifications. — To enable more pipe to 
be received on the C.R.T.S. the caUbrator circuits were 
modified by 

(a) Connecting a -oi UF 350V working condenser 
across C12C and C26B. 

(b) Inserting a 100 K ohm, 1/2 watt resister between 
terminal 3 and terminal 40. 



10. IF Modifications. — (a) The video frequency ampli- 
fiers were removed and output stage and power pack con- 
verted to normal working. IF's were peaked to give i Mc 
bandwidth. Sensitivity as measured by 3/1 signal noise 
ratio method was less than 5 /aV. 



GL TRANSMITTER 

11. Modulator. — The two output Pen 46 valves were 
replaced by ET 44 valves. 

12. Oscillator. — Two -ooi UF 5000V condensers were 
connected across the grid condenser of the oscillator to 
give a wider transmitted pulse. 



19 



C. MODIFICATION TO PERMIT SCR 584 FOLLOW- 
ING OF GL II COARSE BEARING DATA 
13. In order that the SCR 584 could foUow the GL 
equipment in azimuth the remote selsyn on the position 
indicator xmit was coupled to the coarse Bg magsHp trans- 
mitter in the GL receiver. Existing leads to the magslip 
were disconnected and terminals i, 2 and 3 connected to 
terminals 9, 10 and 11 of the terminal strip in the position 
indicator unit. These terminals are of course directly con- 
nected to Si, S2 and S3 of the remote selsyn. The rotor 
of the selsyn was energised from its usual 115V source of 



supply. A pair of leads was connected to terminals 14 
and 15 (i.e.j 11 5V supply to sels3nti) on the position indicator 
unit and connected to the X and Y terminals on the magshp 
through a 200 ohm resistance. This produced 67V at 
terminals X and Y. A switch was incorporated in this 
circuit so that the power to the magslip could be switched 
off when not required to avoid overheating. 

14. Tests were carried out and it was found that the 
remote selsyn followed the Bg magsUp within ±1/2 degree 
when variations of 5 degrees were made. 



Explanation of " BACKFIRE '' 
Survey Grid 



APPEIVDIX 



OUTLINE OF PROBLEM 

1. The requirements were (a) orientation and fixation in 
strict geodetic relationship of a number of points in the 
launching area, (b) orientation and fixation of radar stations 
along the Danish Peninsula, (c) the setting of a grid that 
would agree as nearly as possible with the map grid (Nord 
de Guerre) in the launching area and on which both (a) 
and (b) could be combined with reasonably true relationship. 

SURVEY IN THE LAUNCHING AREA 

2. A normal triangulation which included several trig, 
points was carried out and a mean azimuth and scale 
corrected distance for a baseline were obtained. Nord de 
Guerre co-ordinates using true distance values were com- 
puted for Station WOOD and co-ordinates were then 
computed for the remaining points. 



SURVEY OF RADAR STATIONS 

3. Nord de Guerre or European Zone III co-ordinates 
were obtained from 1/25,000 maps or trig, data and 
orientation from metro and/or trig. data. These values 
were then converted to the " BACKFIRE " grid by the 
methods outlined below. 



THE " BACKFIRE " GRID 

4. Owing to excessive scale factors involved the Nord de 
Guerre projection was not suitable for the area to be 
covered, and the North Exuropean Zone III projection was 
used. To agree with the condition laid down in para, i (c) 
the values obtained on this projection were then given a 
simple change of grid based on the Nord de Guerre and 
European Zone III values obtained for Station WOOD. 



CONVERSION FORMULAS 

5. Station WOOD. 

" BACKFIRE " Co-ordinates : 656,147-0 783,450-0 
Nord de Guerre do. : Same as " BACKFIRE " 

European Zone III do. : 1,151,632-58 199,045-38 

EUROPEAN ZONE III TO " BACKFIRE " 

6. Let : 

a = Bearing change in grids = 10° 16' 20" (to 
nearest second). 
Ee 

_ Diflf. E and N from WOOD in European Zone 
~ III values. 
Nej 

Eb 1 _ Diff. E and N from WOOD in " BACKFIRE" 
Nb 1 values. 

k ■= a scale factor = 0-999415 
Sina= 0-178324053 
Cosa= 0-983971803 

m = k sin a = 0-17821973 
n = k cos a = 0-98339618 
Then: 
Eb = Ee.n - Ne.m 
Nb = Ne.n + Ee.m 

NORD DE GUERRE TO "BACKFIRE" 

RIGOROUS METHOD 

7. Using Lambert Projection Tables : 

(i) Convert Nord de Guerre to French Geographicals. 

(2) Convert these to Danish Geographicals. 

(3) Convert Danish Geographicals to European Zone 

III. 

(4) Convert to " BACKFIRE " by metiiod outiined 

above. 



SCALE FACTORS METHOD 

8. Let A = a point for which both Nord de Guerre and 
" BACKFIRE " co-ordinates are known. 

B = a point for which the " BACKFIRE " co- 
ordinates are required. 

k = " BACKFIRE " scale factor = 0-999415. 

ki = Scale factors from German Nord de Guerre 
charts for the Alid Point of the base AB.* 

kg = Scale factor from North European Zone III. 
Tables for the mid latitude of the base AB. 

C = Angle of conversion between " BACKFIRE " 
and Nord de Guerre grid for the mid point 
of the AB (see para. 9). 

Then, distance AB on Nord de Guerre values X k. kj. 
k2 = distance AB in "BACKFIRE" values, and the 
bearing A to B in Nord de Guerre values plus or minus 
C = Bearing A to B in " BACKFIRE " value. The 
" BACKFIRE " co-ordinates of B can then be computed. 

*ki must not be taken from Nord de Guerre Projection 
Tables. This method will be reasonably accurate pro- 
vided that the point to be changed is not at too great a 
distance from P. When large distances, or areas where 
scale factors become inaccurate, are involved, the rigorous 
method should be used and the scale factors method only 
used as a rough computing check. 



THE BEARING 

9. The angle of conversion of North European Zone III 
and " BACKFIRE " grid is constant. For conversion of 
North European Zone III bearings to "BACKFIRE" 
bearings subtract 10° 16' 20". The angle of conversion 
in seconds between " BACKFIRE " and Nord de Guerre 
grid for a given point A is found by the following formulse : 

Diff. Longitude between point A and Station WOOD 
in seconds X 0-08299. 

East of WOOD the Nord de Guerre bearings are the 
greater, west of WOOD the lesser. 



DISTANCES 

10. A scale factor K = 0.999415 has been introduced in 
the conversion from European Zone III to " BACKFIRE " 
in order that any distance measured on "BACKFIRE" 
grid between Latitudes 53" 40' N and 55°oo' N will not 
differ from the true distance by more than 0-62 metre in 
1,000. This margin of error also holds good for distances 
measured to points further north if measured from the 
launching area. 



GEOGRAPHICAL COORDINATES 

1 1 . Nord de Guerre grid is based on French values. 

European Zone III and Danish grids are based on 

Danish values. 
1/25,000 maps of the G.S.G.S.4414 Germany series 
give German values. 
The corrections are : 
French to German Lat. + 1-30" Long — 3 '15" 
German to Danish Lat. — 6-40" Long + 1-20" 
The Geographical values for Station WOOD are : 
German values : Latitude 53°5o' 30-19" 

: Longitudes o8°35' 15 -oi" East 
of Greenwich. 



TABLES USED 

12. The Lambert Projection Table for the Nord de 
Guerre and North European Zone III issued by the Office 
of the Chief Engineer, Washington, D.C., 1943, and the 
German scale factors chart issued in the SHAEF Survey 
Tech. liistr. No. 138, dated 10 March, 1945, were used. 



LIST OF MAP REFERENCES ON THE " BACKFIRE" 
GRID 

13. Kine 
A 
B 
C 
D 



Theodolite Posts 



Eastings 
661491-2 
656603-3 
663466-6 
659948-4 



Northings 
789113-8 
783056-2 
784002-7 

779772-3 



Ht. 

7-12 
12-21 

0-98 
26-38 



14. Radar Equipments 
R I SCR 584 North 

SCR 584 South 
E I (Redeployed) 

SCR 584 East 

SCR 584 West 
R 2 SCR 584 

GLII 
R 3 SCR 584 

GLII 
R 4 Type 14 

GLII 
R 5 SCR 584 



708825-0 
708825-0 

678701-0 
678523-0 
672652-0 
672698-0 
661296-0 
661374-0 
631844-0 
631760-8 
661512-0 



812575-0 36 
812550-0 36 



836174-0 
836016-0 

855175-0 
855131-0 
891803-0 
891878-0 
1,034152-9 
1,034204-8 
789116-0 



6 

6 

05 

05 

01 



7-1 



15. Launching Site and Aiming Point 
Surveyed Point 

(Collimator) 656470-3 

Launching Point 656459-6 

Aiming Point 557930-0 -,^-_, 

Bg of line of fire (uncorrected for rotation of earth) 

336°46' 35" (" BACKFIRE " = Nord de Guerre) 

or 337° 25' 25" true. 



784040-3 13-67 

784043-9 13-67 

1,013680-0 0-00 



Trajectory Diagrams 



APPENDIX 



6 



ATTACHED ARE THE FOLLOWING TRAJECTORY DATA DIAGRAMS : 



L GROUND PLAN TRACK . . . . . 

2. EXPANDED GROUND TRACK PLAN OF TAKE-OFF 

3. VERTICAL TRAJECTORY DIAGRAM . . 

4. ROCKET VELOCITY— TIME GRAPH . . . . 



5. ROCKET INCLINATION— TIME GRAPH 



r = 1 km. 

1 cm. = 2-5 metres 

1" = 1 km. 

" = 100 m/sec. 

" = 4 sees. 

" = 10 sees. 

" = 4 sees. 



) ROCKET 1 



6, 7, 8, 9, 10— AS ABOVE FOR ROCKET 2. 
11, 12, 13, 14, 15— AS ABOVE FOR ROCKET 3. 

16. ROCKET 3— GROUND PLAN TRACK OF SCR 584 DATA' FROM R 3. 

17. ROCKET 3— VERTICAL TRAJECTORY DIAGRAM OF SCR 584 DATA FROM R 3. 



18. ROCKET 1— GRAPH OF RANGE, BEARING, AND ANGLE OF SIGHT AGAINST TIMES 
FROM SCR 584 AT R 5 AND KINE THEODOLITE SITE " A." 



8000 



7000 



&000- 



795000 



^OOO 



3000 



2 000 



lOOO 



790COO 



9000 



8000 



7000 



bOOO- 



7850OO- 



iCOO- 



5000- 



ROCKET No.L GROUND PLAN 
2nd. OCT. 1945. 1441 hrs. 




DIAGRAM 



RADAR (R.i) 
RADAR (R.5) 



in 

O 

2000[- 5 

X 

cc 
O 
ioooh^ 



78axx) 



LAUNCHiNGSlTE 



EASTINGS 

_J L_ 



-J 1 I !_ 



-J L 



feSOOOD 1000 2000 3000 4000 W5O0O foOOO 70CX) 8000 9000 iMXCC- 



784075 



70 



65 



60 - 



55 



50 



45 



40 - 



35 



30 



784025 



- «/) 

o 

z 

_ 5 

a 
o 

L Z 



-1 « ^ 1 1 1 > f 

DIAGRAM 2 

ROCKET N?l, 

2nd. OCT. 1945. 



GROUND PLAN. 

Scale: I cm. rep. 2*5 m. - 

TIME IN SECONDS 
FROM SHOT, 




WIND SPEED 5 m.p.h. 
WIND BG. 360^ 



EASTINGS. 

_L L-.^ J -J 1 L 



J I I L 



656445 



50 



55 



60 



65 



70 656475 



- 




DIAGRAMS 


ROCKET No. 1. TRAJECTORY. 


55"^ 


^ ./-^SS-J" 


2nd. OCT. 1945. 14-41 hrs. 




y'^5^-B' 


50V/ . ■' 
/ , >9-8" 




■ 






' 


/^' /^ ' RADAR(R.I) 


/f-'' 










' 


■y'^^ 






yAsr 

//'^54-8" 
// 

/ ^' 

/ ^ 

A- 30 -3" 
//'^50-l" 




- 


5« /.f25-8" 

^ /f25-r 

Ui /'■ 

. rao-r 




- 


# (5 ■ 1 " 






|»0-8" 

no*r 

GROUND RANGE IN Kms 

1 1 1 1 1 1 — 1 1 1 ,,. J 1 -J 




-J 1 1 



fO li 



12 IS i4- IS 



DIAGRAM 4 




. 


«» 


>- 




h- 




8 


15^ 


-J 


"~" 


LU 


. 


> 


m 


• 


^ 


■"" 


0^ 


O 


»™i™ 


1^. 






H 


I— 


o 


O 


"O 


o 


c 


0£ 


Q< 



DIAGRAM 5 



IS 


^ 


o 




b 


n. 


< 


^ 


2: 


^ 


ji 







< 


E 




im: 


e» 






O' 




;^ 


•|j 







H 





»u 





^ 


X' 





(C^ 




OS 








p-5 



*»! IIOSi.¥Hn08«l 



7000 



6000 



795000 



4000 - 



3CKX) 



2000 



KXX) 



790000 



9000 



8000 - 



7000 



6000 - 



785000(- I 

X 



40O0 - ^ 



7B3000 



-J- r 



1 r 



DIAGRAM 6 



ROCKET N9 2. GROUND PLAN. 
4th OCT. 1945. 14.16 krs. 




35 ^FUEL CUT-OFF. 



LAUNCHING SITE. 



EASTINGS 



J I I L 



_l L 



650000 lOOO 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 660000 



DIAGRAM 7 



095 



085 



075 



065 



055 



045 



784035 



ROCKET N^2. 4.10.1945. 
GROUND PLAN. 
Scale: I cm. rep. 2*5 m. 



WIND BG 
170° 
WIND SPEED Sm.p.h 



TIME IN SECONDS 
FROM SHOT. 




EASTINGS. 



612 



656435 



445 



455 



465 



"T— r 



-! — — — — r- 



DIAGKAM 8 



14 . 



15 . 



12 . 



10 



ROCKET No.2. TRAJ ECTORY 
4th. OCT. 1945. 14.16 hrs. 




GROUND RANGE IN Km': 



DIAGRAM 9 



> 


^ 


1- 


X 






u 


NO 


o 


1 


5! 




fS 


in 


o- 


'^ 


T 


ON 




— ^ 


H 


H* 


lU 


(> 


^ 

u 





O 


X 


Qi 


^ 




QNOD3S aSd S3aiaN Nl A1I0O13A 



T 1 1 

DIAGRAM 10 



z 




a 


e\j 




►O 

S 


-J 


«£> 






OJ 


, 


o: 


m 


Z 


'"t 


f- 


22 


UJ 


»-: 


^ 


CJ 


u 


O 


o 


■L: 


cr 


"^ 



diO-xna n3nj - 



o 
I 

s J , 



•S33«03a Nl WOIIVNIIDN! 
_J 1 L. 



8000 . 







DIAGRAM II 


\ 


ROCKET 


N?3. GROUND PLAN. 


IS^J^OCT 


. 1945. I5.06 hrs. 


\ \ 
\ / 

A 

A\ 


- 


- 


\ \ 
\\ 
\ x 

\ \ 
\ \ 


. 


- 


\ \ 
\ \ 
\ \ 


- 


- 


^ 


\45" 
\ \ 
\\ ' 


- 




\ Y^q" 


- 






- 




V35" 
V 






V 30" 


" 




V25" 

Vzo" 


- CO 

O 

Z 

X 

O 
z 


EASTINGS 

1 1 1 


-1 1 . . 1 



650000 1000 2000 3000 4000 655000 6000 7000 



9000 660000 



950 

9^5 

9(H) 

879 

8SrO 

8^5 

80-0 

77^ 

75-0 

72-5 

TO'O 

675 

650 

62-5 

60*0 

57-5 

55-0 

5^5 

500 



DIAGRAM 12 



ROCKET N?3 > 
15^ OCT. [945. 

Scale: I cm. rep. 2-5 m. 



^0« TIME IN SECONDS 

FROM SHOT. 



X 
47-51- 2 



45-0. 



784042-5 




WIND SPEED 25 m.p.h. 
WIND 86.320^ 






EASTINGS 

J I L 



656440 42-5 45-0 47-5 50-0 52;5 55-0 57-5 60-0 62-5 



DIAGRAM .13 

I 575" 



ROCKET N?5. TRAJECTORY 
I5*^0CT 1945 - 1506 hrs. 




MO" GROUND RANGE IN KILOMETRES. 



J L 



10 



J L 



DIAGRAM 14 




t 


i 


o 


X 


q 


<o 


J 


o 


UJ 

> 


!£! 


to 


iO 


o 

z 


1 


h 


H 


Ul 


o 


y 


o 


o 
o 


h 


a: 





•03S"a3d S3ai.3kN Nl AilOCHBA 
I I \ L 



z 




O 




— 


k. 


h- 


-C 


< 


VO 


z 





_i 


IT) 


o 




2: 


10 


— 


^ 




ON 


tn 




o- 


h- 


Z 


u 







f~ 


-C 






LJJ 


if) 


i^ 




U 









Ql 





~] T" 

DIAGRAM 15 



00 



o 



o 



S33bOaa Nl NOIIVNIIDNI 



882 



878 - 



874- 



870 - 



866 - 



8b2 - 



858 - 



85^ 







, , J , „, 


DIAGRAM 16 


- 






r 




\ 








\ 


Ai-f^ 


. 




\ 


/ ROCKET N0.3. 15.10.45. 






.0^ 


SCR 584 at R3. GROUND PLAN 








J00\ 


Scale : Icm. rep. 1 Km. 






\ 








V^ 


- 






\ r 










/V^b-4 

\\ 








"^JS 


- 






' \ \ 


O 

z 






^59-9 


X 

a 
O 

z 






Y592 




EASTINGS 


1 


i 1 



616 



bio 



b24 



628 



632 





T 1 T" 


— 1 1 


1 


— J — 


"T r r-' I 




o 








DIAGRAM 17 


• 


« 








* 


■ 










- 




\* 


























. 


L 


o 




" 






\ 1 


= 




• 






\ 1 


iO 


- 


•' 






4 


o 


** 


•- 










" 


* 






z\ 


C4 


* 


• 






\ 


er> 


- 


* 






1 


: 


- 


-- 








\ 


- 


• 


♦ 
>- 




' 




- 




O 






1 \ 




- 


o 






\ 


- 


- 


to 


LU 

< 








i "? 




O 


q: 


, 




V«*- 


"■ 


h- 


E 




^ 


\\ 




• 




^ 




^ 


\ \ 




m 










\ \ 


- 


— 


• 


"~~ 






\ \ <v * 




, 


CO 


cL 






\ 


<*- 


. 


fO 


Of 


0) 








. 




6 


4J 


• 








t^ 


- 


z 


CO 


E 
o 






ItO 


• 


UJ 


00 

in 


'• 








- 


o 


of 
O 


CO 






O 1 \ Ul * 

<i \ O 




a: 


CO 


CO 






o> \ Z 












\\ "^ 












■2 /^ at: 


" 










IQ- o- 




i— .. 1 1 , 


— 1 1 


, 


- !_..„ 


±H0I3H 
1 t 1 1 



s 



Oh 



O 

ON 



00 



O 
00 



CO 






>0 



43 



O 

^0 



00 
try 



in 



— , I I 1 I I 1- 

DIAGRAM 18 



;■-/—•/ 



280 - 56 

278 1- 54 _ "/■^///ll 

ROCKET N°l. 14.16 HRS. 2"^QCT. 1945. /^~ //! 

2761-52 ~ ../ I' I 

RANGE. BEARING. ANGLE OF SIGHT AND HEIGHT FROM // / / 

^74 [-50 SCR 584 AT R5 COMPARED miW KI DATA . /" // '^ 

272 h 48 / / / 



RADAR 



/.^ 



270f-46 KT. -_ // / / 9-j 

/ // // 

268 U4 / // ,/ 

2B6-42 // // / 8 

/ // / 

264^40 / / / 

2621-38 / / / 7 

if / / / 

258 1- 34 / // !/ // 6 

/ / // / 



2601-36 



2541-30 / ,/ / /Is 

// / / / 2 

,252|-2B°cN / ,/ / / o 

? 250 -26- // ,/ il I '-4 

- - / ,/ / / ! 

1 248 - 24 txi // // / / 

§246^22 < //■ / / S3 

2441-20 # / / 

>--^ / / 

242 h8 .// / / 2-1 

, / • / ./ 

240 M6 ,/"■ / / / 



X 



/" 



.^^ / / / 

238 M4 ,-^-'^ / / y I 

236 M2 ,^^ / / ./" 

/ / y/' 

234 MO ^/ ..>- 

232-8 _ RANGE _ £_ ..^......--'-■"-^'""" /'' 

230 \ 6 x^^/'' ./ 

■^26 I" 2 BEARiNG ^^--^^^^ TIME. ! IN. = 2 SECONDS 

o7f"-"?o'"'"9^ 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 



16 



15 



o 

o 



13 2 



12^ 

z 
3 



91° 96° 107° 119° 130° 139° 

ASPECT ANGLE ASPECT ANGLE ASPECT ANGLE ASPECT ANGLE ASPECT ANGLE ASPECT ANGLE 



Photographic Records . 



SECTIOIV 



2 



STILL PHOTOGRAPHY 

57. Photographs of the installations, equipments, proce- 
dures, and launchings were taken by the British Army Film 
Photographic Unit (A.F.P.U.) using a Zeiss Super Ikonta, 
6 cm. X 6 cm., 2-8 Zeiss Tessar lens camera and by the 
U.S. Army Signal Corps Photographic Unit using a Kodak 
Speed Graphic 5-in x 4-in camera. 



ACTION PHOTOGRAPHY 

58. A detachment of the British Army Kinematograph 
Service was employed to take shots which will be used in 
the preparation of a training film. The object of the film 
is not to record operation " BACKFIRE " but to show 
how the A-4 works, its handling from railhead to firing 
point, and the process of laimching. Shooting commenced 
on Sept. 12, 1945, and was completed on Oct. 22, 1945. 
All sequences were shot at KRUPPS or the firing site, with 
the exception of a few shots of German operational 
launching positions in The HAGUE area. 



59. The equipment used was : 

(a) Cameras 

3 Newman cameras 
I Mitchell camera 
3 Vinten cameras 
I Eyemo camera 

(b) Searchlight equipment 

3 X 5 kw lamps 
6 X 2 kw lamps 
3 X 500 kw lamps 



with remote control 
gear for filming 
launchings. 



60. For filming the launchings on Oct 2, Oct 4, and 
Oct 15, 1945, remotely controlled and manually operated 
cameras were used. The remote controlled cameras were 
positioned on two gun shields which were erected on the 
launching site (see Plate 5). The cameras were started 
from the command post. 



OCTOBER 2, 1945. First Launch. 

(a) Remotely controlled cameras, 
(i) Gunshield i. 

I Vinten 40 mm. lens 32 f.p.s. fixed frame 
Ascent of rocket. 
(ii) Gunshield 2. 

I Vinten 6 in. lens 32 f.p.s. fiaced frame. 

Base of rocket. 

I Eyemo 2 in. lens 32 f.p.s. fixed frame. 

All rocket. 

(b) Manually operated cameras. 
Operated from hghthouse 2,000 yds. S.W. of firing point. 



I Mitchell 2 in. lens 
I Newman 12 in. lens 
I Newman 6 in, lens 



192 f.p.s. fixed frame. 

Ascent of rocket. 

24 fp.s. Following 

ascent of rocket. 

52 f.p.s. Following 

ascent of rocket. 



OCTOBER 4, 1945. Second launch. 
(a) Remotely controlled cameras, 
(i) Gunshield i. 

I Vinten 40 mm. lens 



(ii) Gimshield 2. 
I Vinten 



2 in. lens 



I Vinten 6 in. lens 



32 f.p.s. fixed frame. 
Ascent of rocket. 

96 f.p.s. fixed frame. 

AH rocket. 

32 f.p.s. fixed frame. 

Base of rocket. 
(b) Manually operated cameras. 

Situated 640 yds. in rear of Shelters i and 2. 
I Mitchell 12 in. lens 192 f.p.s. \ All cameras 
I Newman 12 in. lens 24 f.p.s. I covered ascent 
I Newman 6 in. lens 32 f.p.s. | from take-oflf to 
I Eyemo 3 in. lens 32 f.p.s. j smoke trail 

OCTOBER 15, 1945. Third Launch. 

(a) Remotely controlled cameras. 

As for second launch on October 4, 1945. 

(b) Manually operated cameras. 

Positioned in slit trenches S. of command post 60 yds. 
from the rocket. 

(Covered ascent 
of rocket from 
take-oflf to dis- 
appearance 
cloud. 



61. Details of cameras used for the three launchings are 
as follows : 



62. On all launching days the cameras used infra red film 
except the 2 A.K.S. Vintens. Other sequences were shot 
with Kodak Plus X or Super XX. 



41 



DETAILS OF LAYOUT LAUNCHING SITE. 



\ 



Plate 5. 

Scale: 1:2500 



COMMAND POST. 




'LEGEND 



• DISTRIBUTION CHAMBER. 
n PHOTOGRAPHIC SHIELD. 



Fuel Characteristics and Storage 



SECTION 



3 



I 



LIQUID OXYGEN 

63. Quantity required per rocket = 5,000 kg. (10,930 lb.) 
Purity = 98 per cent. 
Boiling temperature under 

atmospheric pressure = — 183° centigrade 

Latent heat = 52 cal. per gram. 

(water = 560 cal. per 
gram) 

64. When standing in the tanker, liquid oxygen has the 
interesting property that its purity actually improves, the 
gas which boils off carrying a large proportion of nitrogen. 
There is no need to include a purity test at the site as the 
factory material is above 99 per cent, oxygen. 

65. Any particles of oil in the liquid oxygen, present by 
mischance, tend to float to the top when it is standing in 
the tanker. It is then a good practice to avoid completely 
emptying the tanker. 

66. For the men engaged in transferring the oxygen from 
the rail tanker to the road tanker, and subsequendy to the 
rocket, the Germans provided complete sets of asbestos 
clothing. 

67. Storage and transport tanks are double- walled with 
the inner tank of copper or aluminium and the outer wall 
of steel plate. The inter-space is filled with insulating 
material of a non-combustible character in powder form. 

68. When the external size is restricted as in rail or road 
transport sacrifice has to be made in the extent of the 
insulation provided. This is brought out in the following 
table for tanks which were used in the operation. 



TANK 


CAPACITY 


THICKNESS OF INSULATION 


FASSBURG 
STORAGE 


56 tons 


40 inches 


RAIL 


30 tons 


12 inches 


ROAD 


6| tons 


9 inches 



ALCOHOL 

69. The standard material used was ethyl alcohol, as this 
gives an increase in range of about 30 kms. (260-290 kms.) 
over methyl alcohol. 



Quantity required per rocket = 4 tons (8,150 lb. or 

3700 kg. approx.), but 
varying according to 
range. 
= 75 per cent. 
= -8599 at 15° centigrade, 
and '8556 at 20° centi- 
grade. 



Concentration by weight 
Specific gravity 



Freezing temperature 
(100 per cent, material) 



= — 130° centigrade 



70. The alcohol railway tank waggons used by the Germans 
are of a series of different types of up to 20 tons capacity. 
They have bottom connections for emptying through the 
portable alcohol pump. 

HYDROGEN PEROXIDE 

71. Quantity required per rocket = 126 Htres (370 lb.). 
Concentration by weight = 78-80 per cent. 
Specific gravity (A-4 Fuel) = 1-34 

Specific gravity (100 per cent, 
material) = 1-4633 at 0° centi- 

grade. 
Freezing temperature (100 per 

cent, material) = -1-9° centigrade 

(but undercook 
easily) 

72. Hydrogen peroxide is stored in aluminium tanks 
whose capacity varies from 300 tons, as at Duneburg, to 
20 tons, as at Kiel. Two types of rail tankers have been 
encountered, viz. — a large single tank of 20 tons capacity, 
and a smaller size with four separate cross-tanks each of 
2^ ton capacity, making 10 tons in all. The small tanker 
was the one usually used for transporting hydrogen 
peroxide for the A-4 rockets to the railhead. Top con- 
nections alone are provided. The transfer of liquid to the 
road tanker is made by a pump whose suction hose is 
inserted through the top opening. Hoses used are made of 
Mipolam. 

SODIUM PERMANGANATE 

73. Quantity required per rocket = 11 htres (31 lb.) 



Specific gravity 
Purity 



= 1-26 

= 27 per cent, solution 



74. This comes forward in sealed cans, each with a 
capacity of about two gallons. It is transferred into the 
rocket direcdy from one of these cans by the use of a tin 
funnel. 



43 



■■\.